One-stop for ESG data aggregation, visualization, and implementation in management

Including frameworks like CSRD and SSBJ, from global consolidated disclosure compliance to portfolio management for financial institutions, TERRAST for Enterprise (T4E) and TERRAST for Management (T4M) provide robust support for the digital transformation (DX) of your company's ESG-related operations.

Challenges on ESG data management

Distribution Warehouse with High Shelves

Problem

Challenges in procurement departments managing supply chains

Spending significant time and effort on survey form aggregation
Ineffective in analyzing and utilizing collected survey data
Only able to deploy to a subset of suppliers, creating challenges
Desiring to standardize due to independently created and managed survey forms

Problem

Challenges in corporate headquarters managing ESG data for the entire group

Time-consuming verification and revisions due to varying formats among consolidated subsidiaries
Difficulties in integrative data aggregation, requiring extensive effort for report creation
Frameworks like CSRD extraterritorial requirements, SSBJ standards, and third-party assurances, the organization is exploring the adoption of a rational and user-friendly system.

Problem

Challenges for financial institutions evaluating lending companies

Inefficient data collection flow from client companies, making it difficult to gather necessary information
Searching for an easy-to-use ESG data aggregation tool for small and medium enterprises

Abstract Linear Background_edited_edited.jpg

SOLUTION

Streamline management processes with our one-stop solution

TERRAST for Enterprise (T4E) ・TERRAST for Management (T4M)

Easily handle non-financial data and centralize ESG information across subsidiaries and financial partners for streamlined operations

Efficiently consolidate non-financial data from business partners and centrally manage ESG information for subsidiaries and lending targets

FUNCTION

How TERRAST products can do for you

自社のESGデータの集計を
ワンストップ化

T4Eは、自社のESGデータの集計・可視化のためのDXツールです。E,S,Gそれぞれ異なる方法で管理・保持しているものを、各子会社・拠点単位で集約。CSRDやSSBJといった開示基準に沿ったレポーティングに向けた、合理的・効率的なデータ集計をサポート。

ESGスコアレポートによる可視化

入力したデータをもとに、同業界データと比較した場合のスコアレポートを出力。自社のESG取組状況の可視化につながり、子会社やサプライヤー企業のESG状況の把握や、改善のためのコミュニケーションツールとしても活用可能。

データの提出・連携

集約した自社のESG情報は、上場親会社や調達部門、銀行などへのデータ連結・連携が可能です。これにより、データ提出依頼先への対応、評価の向上が期待できます。

ワンストップに取引先のESGデータ
入力状況を確認

T4Mでは、取引先がT4Eを使って集めたESGデータの入力状況をを一覧で確認でき、個別の入力内容をタイムリーに把握できるため、
ESGデータ収集プロセスの効率化と正確性が向上します。

子会社や取引先のESGデータの集計をスムーズに。SSBJなどの開示基準にも対応

T4E利用企業のESG情報を自動集計し、拠点単位や支店単位など様々な軸で状況をダッシュボード化します。
また、全体のESGデータの開示率やスコアリング完了率などを一目で確認でき、ESGデータの収集・管理・モニタリングを効率化します。

集計したデータの開示や活用

T4Mで集計したデータを用いて、拠点や企業規模など、様々な軸で分析が可能です。
また集計結果をダウンロードし、有価証券報告書の人的資本開示項目としての出力や、ESGデータ集の基礎情報として活用頂けます。
更に、今後はSSBJ等の開示フォーマットに合わせた出力も可能となります。
（現在開発中）

集計結果を一括ダウンロード
取引先の分析・改善策に活用

T4Mで集計した取引先のESG情報をExcelデータとして 一括ダウンロードできます。
ダウンロードしたデータは、
社内での報告書作成や戦略立案に活用でき、
各部門間での情報共有がスムーズになります。

Case Study

Industry Challenges & Solutions

For Major manufacturing company(Disclose ESG Data on a Consolidated), Bank, Corporate Financial and Non-financial Analysis

T4E_CaseStudy_Major manufacturing company_small.png

Case Study 1

大手製造業

（連結ベースでESGデータを開示）

詳細を見る

Case Study 4

大手エネルギー企業

サプライチェーン全体のESGデータ管理

詳細を見る

T4E_CaseStudy_Major manufacturing company_small (1).png

Case Study 2

某大手小売企業

（人的資本経営の定量化）

詳細を見る

T4E_CaseStudy_Major manufacturing company_small (2).png

Case Study 3

地域金融機関

詳細を見る

Frequently asked questions

Q&A

T4E

We do not make individual qualitative judgments on a company-by-company basis, but use unified statistical and mathematical processing to conduct neutral and objective ESG assessments and data estimation. Due to the nature of the service we provide, we do not conduct prior confirmation with individual companies prior to the release of their ratings and data. If you have any questions regarding our assessments or data, please contact us through the "Contact Us" link on this website.

Evaluation indicators are items tuned for Japanese companies while complying with international frameworks such as IIRC, GRI, SASB and SDG Compass. In addition, the evaluation method uses machine learning modeling to introduce different weights for each industry and theme, and adjusts and processes them so that they can be compared with other industries and other companies. In addition, evaluation indicators and evaluation methods will be continuously updated in a timely manner in response to changes in market conditions and social conditions.

Sustainability Score Calculation Procedure

Non-financial indicators have different orientations, so they are adjusted. (e.g. Smaller CO2 emissions and higher waste recycling rates are desirable)
In order to enable comparison between companies regardless of business scale, each non-financial indicator is converted into a ratio with financial indicators according to their characteristics. (e.g. CO2 emissions → CO2 emissions per unit of sales)
Calculate the deviation value within the industry (using the GICS 69 industry classification) for each index.
Determine the weight of each non-financial indicator according to the disclosure rate in the industry, various sustainability frameworks (GRI, SASB, etc.) and the common use ratio of ESG evaluation organizations, etc., and use the weighted average for each materiality score derived.
Based on various sustainability frameworks and materiality maps of ESG rating agencies, we determine the weight of the materiality score for each industry and derive the sustainability score. The materiality score takes into consideration the environment, risks, and opportunities of each industry. For example, energy and manufacturing industries emphasize environment-related indicators, while industries with strict global regulations, such as finance and healthcare, focus on governance-related indicators. attach more importance.

SDGs score calculation procedure

1-3 is the same as Sustainability Score.
Individual non-financial indicators according to the disclosure rate in the industry, various sustainability frameworks (GRI, SASB, etc.) and the common use ratio of ESG rating agencies, etc. , and derive the score of each 17 SDGs target.
The sustainability score is calculated using the same weight for all 17 SDGs target scores.

よくある質問

Contact Us

For more details about our services, demos, and inquiries, please feel free to contact us.

We constantly improve the product and expand the data coverage, functions, and collaborations to serve more clients in other regions. So it is very welcome to hear your feedback.

Please feel free to drop us your message.

One-stop for ESG data aggregation, visualization, and implementation in management

Challenges on ESG data management

Problem

Problem

Problem